What if they simultaneously think transit stations lower their property value, high density housing lower their property value, but also they are “poor” because they can’t afford to move else where?

Have you considered their opinions mhmmmm? /s

Link to study?

The City of Montreal currently has the goal of reaching a 75 per cent active mode share, including cycling, walking and public transit, by 2050.

“In order to achieve that level of public transportation use, we need a lot more than just densifying around public transportation,” Roncace said. “We also need to discourage car use…

Translation: fuck cars

Also makes a hell of a lot more sense to build electric busses and trains than electric cars ffs

Seems obvious, but I guess it’s good to have more support.

W

O

W

Ferda jerbs!

No shit sherlock. Now build more public transport.

Economic benefits for whom? I’m pretty sure politicians don’t economically benefit for pushing public transport against the wishes of the car and fossil fuel lobbyist owning them.