
Family life

Tie over the apron?
Yeah, THATâS what heâs wearing thatâs the most objectionable đ

Well one of these fashion choices I have seen before, and its not the tie over the apron.
Definitely dark, but for a lot true crime fans this is just an average Tuesday.

I think youâre right about it being borderline. At first glance, Leatherface just looks like a cartoon zombie. You have to look closely and maybe read the comic to understand the implied gore.

Hi, OP. I could see this being considered borderline, but Iâd ask per Rule 2 that you mark this as NSFW.
NSFW wound be overkill for this. This is mild.
I think that if you can get in trouble by watching something like this at work you should not be browsing internet at work.
Lots of jobs have expected down time. Itâs always better to err on the side of caution because for a chunk of the Lemmy population, you can be fired for anything.
People are pussies. Protect innocent eyes.

I think NSFW is good in this case.
I think youâre right about it being borderline. At first glance, Leatherface just looks like a cartoon zombie. You have to look closely and maybe read the comic to understand the implied gore.
Bit overzealous in my opinion, but I appreciate you making the request rather than delete first and ask questions never like most mods with a problem, so sure!
While I sure wouldnât go sharing it in an email thread, I wouldnât say itâs overtly nsfw. Might raise a few questions of that was your common taste though.
So a mask is okay if itâs animal skins or depicting anything else, but not human? Whatâs the nsfw part? Thereâs no gore or blood.

So a mask is okay if itâs animal skins[?]

Youâre preaching to the choir on the speciesism angle.
This isnât a prescriptivist moral judgment; itâs trying to be descriptive of what someone would reasonably think âwould otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers [âŚ]â. That attempt at descriptivism is why I was hoping for feedback like your comment.
Moreover, if you were to swap out the victims and faces in this comic with cows, pigs, etc., Iâd probably be asking the same question.
Thereâs no gore or blood.
Interpreting âgoreâ as âpictures and videos of graphic violence and human deathâ, this is an intentionally graphic illustration of human faces that have been meticulously cut off of the heads of people violently murdered by chainsaw whose dried blood spatter is coating the apron of one of the characters.
Most of this subâs readership is human.
Yes women do have their lives ended by men a lot in our society.
I think this fact overshadows any humor I can find in the idea of two normalized killers calling their trophy collection a âfacebookâ.
The morbid reality that lots of men think of women as lesser or disposable is just going to creep in on me, sorry.

Your are overthinking a comic where the punchline is âfacebook but taken too literallyâ. Honestly i think lemmy has this problem where too many people overthink on jokes
Youâre underthinking it.
If the man / woman roles were reversed in the four panel comic would you find humour in its subversiveness and reversal of tropic norms?
Edit: by âtropicâ I mean relating to tropes, not Cancer nor Capricorn.
Violence against women isnât the same character of crime, its not a crime where you (God like), can switch one gender out for another and have it play out to the same social/gendered beats, for the same social and cultural reasonings and circumstances.
Iâve said elsewhere that itâs not the comic that bothers me, itâs the wider social issues that push or lead to violence against women.
All that said, and perhaps more in line with what youâre asking (although my response probably wonât satisfy you): Iâm not interested in redeeming or fixing the comic, or making it subversive. Iâll leave that to the content creators.

I think you might be overthinking a comic where the punchline is âHey remember Leatherface from the well-known horror film The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, who had the mask made of human skin? I bet if he referred to âFacebookâ, it would be a literal book filled with faces.â
Hell, Iâd bet real money that the only reason they specifically mentioned a teenage blonde is because one of the film victims was a teenage blonde. They mention her âhangingâ around there, and the blonde teen in the film gets hung on a meat hook.
It sounds like your gripe is with the film, and the horror genre in general. This comic is just a pun.
This is a reference to a character from The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974).
Itâs not funny to me either.
I think itâs because most would agree the punchline isnât itâs funny because the Facebook is real faces - thatâs just not very funny, especially given the context of Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Leatherface, that takes away any absurdist element as itâs grounded in their context.
To explain this to downvoters, imagine it was an unknown killer speaking to a random accomplice and they were browsing a bunch of assorted races and gendered faces in the book, without the reference to the blonde 18yo girl. Is that still funny, or is it just a meh joke hardly worth drawing, and not worth an upvote. I think the latter?
The real punchline is that itâs funny because of how casually they talk about the murder of 18 year old, screaming girls. Itâs subversive edgy humour in the worst way - punching down to a relatively powerless group in a way that dehumanises them to nothing more than a throwaway premise about a Facebook.
Bleh.
Wouldnât hardly be the first unfunny strip in this comm thatâs highly upvoted.
The 18 year old blonde is a horror trope, and part of the original movie. The comic is really just about the âFacebookâ joke.
personally when I trap women in my basement to butcher, I want them to fight it. I mean that with all sincerity. I spent the last ten years building this murder hut into the side of a mountain so nobody can hear you scream, but that doesnât mean you shouldnât scream.
I mean come on, look at all the effort I had to go through to make this dream a reality! the least a woman could do is play along with it.
but no. modern women just crawl into one of the roach infested corners and sob quietly as I peel off their sorority sisters face off. such a fucking insult! sure Barbara, you can write a flame review for your pumpkin spiced latte with a turd in it, but you wonât give my efforts the time of day?!
you know, this is probably why I kill them. not because I want to, but because if I didnât skin them alive they would just think less of me as a man.
fucking women, am I right guys?
This satire is too close to what too many redpilled losers believe for me to enjoy it. I appreciate the quality effort though.
For point of reference, is there any name/description that wouldnât make you upset? They could say any name and any description and thereâs some case somewhere of that group being harmed. That all not accounting for the notion that thereâs no indication his entire âbookâ is young women to give it some measure of objectification/lessering.
Itâs just a crass comic depicting crazy killer sorts, whole movie/tv franchises have been spawned off such tales and events.
Not finding something funny isnât the same as finding it upsetting.
Everyone wants an excuse to complain about some from of opinionated injustice. At the end of the day itâs all worthless and will be forgotten in 200 years.
I mean he kind of looks like Zuckerberg