the image linked to by the post is the Pangram LLM-detection report of paragraphs in the first screenshot below, reading “100% AI”. in lieu of alt text for the screenshots below, I suggest scrolling through @eicker@lemmy.world’s profile and lemmy.world/comment/26323310, which the screenshots are of. Look at the vote counts.
Piefed has some LLM detection tools for moderators as well as bot detection for admins.
It’s also worth pointing out that some users on here use translation tools which may trigger some of these “AI Detectors”.
FYI: Pangram sucks. It’s about as accurate as throwing darts these days.
A long, long time ago (i.e. 2024) there was only one LLM that was widely used by the populace: ChatGPT. It only had a few versions and they didn’t differ much in how they worded output.
Now it’s 2026 and we have hundreds of thousands of AI models. That includes over 1000 commercial vendor models!
Another thing that’s really important that you need to understand is that even if two providers run the same model, their configurations will be different and thus, their output won’t be the same.
To summarize: There’s no fucking way Pangram can work properly anymore. It’s useless garbage.
Why should I take that piece of AI detection software at its word? I looked at that user’s comment history and, while admitting I am not an expert on it, do not see any obvious signs of AI. If that’s AI, mission fucking accomplished.
Reviewing @eicker@lemmy.world’s comment history, they do appear to use ‘that’s not X, it’s Y’—something ChatGPT is known for—unusually often.
You’re on one of the only actively pro-AI instances…
And you came here to complain an account seems to be using a chat bot?