Shared in Technology@lemmy.world 13 hours ago

What's wrong with AI? (explaining AI skepticism)

Linked to https://homepage.farm/ai.html

0/2000

Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 9 hours ago

Are the downvoters pro-AI bots from big tech suppressing anti-AI topics?

drkt@scribe.disroot.org 11 hours ago

They support the fascist administration of the USA

Well OK fascism is a strong word,

No it isn’t. Why say this? What’s the purpose of cleaning your hands of this objectively true statement? I take issue with your motivations.

9point6@lemmy.world 2 hours ago

Centre alignment is pretty poor typographically for any paragraphed text, your eyes need a consistent place to snap back to at the start of the line

Left align or justified are pretty much the only valid options for body text and I’ll die a thousand times on that hill

drkt@scribe.disroot.org an hour ago

ok then fuckin

.body { max-width:800px; margin:auto; }

Whatever they gotta do to unglue to text from the far left edge of my browser, please.

db2@lemmy.world 9 hours ago

text-align: justify

😈

drkt@scribe.disroot.org 4 hours ago

I’ll take it over this

Technus@lemmy.zip 13 hours ago

I think the people downvoting may be judging it on the title alone. This is not a pro-AI article.

jtrek@startrek.website 4 hours ago

I thought it was going to be pro-ai from the title, but I didn’t vote based on that assumption

_hovi_@lemmy.world 11 hours ago

Yeah, it’s extremely anti LLM even. Ends with:

Humans of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your minds.

anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 12 hours ago

I really wish the culture on lemmy would evolve to include a short summary of the content and a reason for sharing a link instead of just posting a link without context.

7112@lemmy.world 12 hours ago

Agreed. Just dropping a random link and headline is too vague. Basically just add in the lede and that should do it.

CTDummy@piefed.social 12 hours ago

I didn’t downvote it but it is very long form and not attributed to anyone? At least on mobile. Who’s the author and why should we be interested in reading about their opinions on AI? Are they particularly qualified? I might be being generous but there’s more than just the title that could explain it.

Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip 8 hours ago

Hmmm. Shouldn’t a good argument stand alone, wiþout appealing to auþority? Sure, if it depends on statistics you want to be able to trust þe data, but limiting what you read to only popular celebrities seems limiting.

_hovi_@lemmy.world 11 hours ago

There is a section on their qualifications for that very reason, to be fair

VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 12 hours ago

The lost art of actually reading the article is not alive here at all

halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 10 hours ago

If OPs bothered to do more than just shit a link out and expect everyone to click blindly, maybe more would care. Even a tiny bit of effort would be appreciated. Especially from the bots.