RE: https://mas.to/@nnedi/117414695668124551
Read Nnedi Okorafor's essay on the distinction between *africanfuturism* and *afrofuturism* here: https://nnedi.blogspot.com/2019/10/africanfuturism-defined.html
Quote: "Africanfuturism is concerned with visions of the future, is interested in technology, leaves the Earth, skews optimistic, is centered on and predominantly written by people of African descent (black people) and it is rooted first and foremost in Africa. It's less concerned with "what could have been" and more concerned with "what is and can/will be". It acknowledges, grapples with and carries "what has been"."
The essay dives in more.
Both genre's are awesome and the distinction is very important.
After reading the essay, go read some books within both genre's. To get started with africanfuturism, look here: https://nnedi.com/books/
#africanfuturism #nnediokorafor #books #bookstodon #afrofuturism #solarPunk
This affects the Fediverse.
This affects the Internet.
This is the equivalent of the "rubber hose method" of decryption.
All technical solutions (read: all technology) is subject to politics. To political power. To political interactions.
You cannot rely on purely technical approaches. You have to have social approaches, too. Like. Actual policy and procedure geared around social and political group dynamics.
Like. How will we react when the US Govt requires that @jerry to shut off infosec.exchange servers.
Or how we'll react when a specific Mastodon server is declared part of a terrorist infrastructure. Will federating with it mean any other Mastodon server is now part of the officially designated terrorist network (what then of people that federate with a server that federates with a server that is classified as part of a terrorist network. And so on)
You cannot carry the conceit that tech alone or a purely technical approach will save you.









